MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403022224 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3432137

Boosting Communication Efficiency in Federated Learning for Multiagent-Based Multimicrogrid Energy Management

2024· article· en· W4403022224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBoosting (machine learning)Computer scienceEfficient energy useArtificial intelligenceKnowledge managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Privacy of user is becoming increasingly significant in constructing efficient multiagent energy management systems for multimicrogrid (MMG). As an emerging privacy-protection method, federated learning (FL) has been used to prevent data breaches in the MMG-related field. However, with the ever-growing participants, the underlying communication burden existing in FL is evident. Besides, since the neural network layers collectively determine an agent's performance, the possible difference in layer convergence speeds would cause the inconsistency problem, that is, the FL may degrade the convergence rate of those fast-convergent layers, which weakens the overall performance of the agent. To address these issues, a communication-efficient FL (CEFL) algorithm is proposed in this study. Considering the cooperative relationship among layers, a layer evaluation (LE) mechanism is developed in CEFL to evaluate layer contribution through the Shapley value (SV), a profit distribution approach for coalitions. In this way, only partial layers with the highest contributions are selected to be uploaded to the server. In addition, instead of average parameters aggregation, a communication-efficient parameter aggregation method is proposed in CEFL to update the parameters of the global model (GM), in which an aggregation model (AM) is developed to receive parameters for aggregation. The performance of the proposed CEFL is verified by the numerical analysis of MMGs with 3-8 MGs participating. Furthermore, experiments investigate the influence of the hyperparameter in the CEFL and also demonstrate performance improvements, compared with the other four state-of-the-art algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it