Dual-band Hybrid Dielectric Resonator-patch Antenna for Microwave and Mm-wave Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a pioneering approach to advanced antenna design focusing on a dual-band hybrid configuration, combining the strengths of dielectric resonator antennas (DRAs) and serial patch antennas. The study explores the significance of this hybrid architecture in addressing the demanding requirements of both microwave and millimeter-wave (mm-wave) applications in modern communication systems. The paper introduces a meticulously crafted antenna design that seamlessly integrates these technologies for optimal performance. In the microwave band, the proposed antenna achieves a realized gain of 12.54dBi, a match impedance of 10.7%, and operates at a frequency of 5.8GHz. Similarly, in the mm-wave band, the antenna exhibits a realized gain of 12.5dBi, a match impedance of 10.2%, and operates at a frequency of 30GHz. This novel dual-band hybrid antenna design serves as a noteworthy contribution to the evolving landscape of advanced antenna technologies, offering practical solutions to the complex challenges of contemporary communication systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".