Enhancing Equity Trading through Ensemble Learning with Reddit Sentiment Analysis and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The challenge of accurately predicting stock market movements largely stems from its nature as a game with incomplete information. With the emergence of social media, platforms like Reddit became key arenas for expressing financial senti-ments, offering new insights into market dynamics influenced by retail investors. In this study, we trained an XGBoost model using daily financial data for Tesla, including technical indicators and sentiment analysis derived from Reddit posts about the company. This approach enhanced the model's ability to predict market directions, achieving a statistically significant improvement in accuracy with a p-value of 0.000237. Furthermore, our model is equipped with Explainable AI to allow users to understand the basis of its predictions, increasing transparency and trust. Implementing a straightforward trading strategy based on these predictions yielded a 174.36% gain in a backtest from December 2022 to December 2023, outperforming the baseline stock by 42.40 points and the S&P 500 index by 147.97 points. This paper highlights the potential of leveraging social media sentiments to gain deeper market insights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it