Efficient Segmentation for Large-Scale Filtering Based on Overlap-Save Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In modern communication systems, especially in fiber optics, implementing large-scale filters is inevitable. Finite impulse response implementation of these filters leads to intractable complexity, but advanced methods such as Overlap-Save (OLS) and Overlap-Add exist that significantly reduce complexity by implementing filters in the frequency domain. However, these methods require the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) size to be larger than the filter size, limiting their applicability due to hardware constraints on the FFT size. In this paper, to remove this limitation, we propose a novel approach called low-complexity OLS-based segmented filter (LOSF). LOSF not only allows the FFT size to be smaller than the filter but also efficiently handles digital processing tasks, minimizing the number of FFT blocks required. We demonstrate the efficacy of LOSF through theoretical analysis and simulation studies, showcasing its ability to implement arbitrarily large filters within practical hardware constraints. Simulation results indicate that LOSF outperforms existing methods, achieving significant complexity reduction while maintaining filter performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it