MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Motion Capture Technology for Enhancing Live Dance Performances

2024· article· en· W4403024515 on OpenAlexaff
Sofiia Khutorna, Derek Jacoby, Anthony Estey, Yvonne Coady

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceMotion captureComputer scienceMotion (physics)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer graphics (images)Visual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dancing with Avatars: Can Shadows Keep Pace? Commodity motion capture (mo-cap) equipment and Virtual Reality (VR) can now be combined to create highly synchronized movements between physical and digital worlds. Precise shadowing, however, requires some innovative techniques to accurately capture streaming movement data for virtual dancers. In our research, we stream body movement data from a Rokoko Smartsuit Pro II to a virtual character in Unreal Engine and project the character behind the dancer to assess how close to real-time the shadowing can be. Our results show how to obtain the most precise mo-cap data from the suit sensors and use it to enhance a dance performance in various ways. In this paper, we will explain how we overcame the challenges associated with a setup for live streaming and demonstrate our findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207