MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403024872 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.27.615458

Chromosome-level genome assembly of a doubled haploid brook trout ( <i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i> )

2024· preprint· en· W4403024872 on OpenAlexafffund
Laurie Lecomte, Anne‐Laure Ferchaud, Éric Normandeau, Claire Mérot, Isabelle Langlois-Parisé, Jean-Cristophe Therrien, Pierre Bérubé, Haig Djambazian, Pubudu M. Nawarathna, Dylan J. Fraser, Jiannis Ragoussis, Louis Bernatchez

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Research in Immunology and CancerConcordia UniversityParks CanadaMcGill Genome CentreUniversité Laval
FundersConcordia UniversityGenome CanadaUniversité Laval
KeywordsSalvelinusFontinalisTroutPloidyChromosomeBiologyGenomeFisheryChromosome numberZoologyGeneticsEvolutionary biologyFish <Actinopterygii>KaryotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) is a socioeconomically important fish species for fisheries, aquaculture and aquatic conservation. We produced a 2.5 Gb reference assembly by combining Hi-C chromosome conformation capture with high-coverage short- and long-read sequencing of a fully homozygous mitotic gynogenic doubled haploid fish, which facilitates assembly of highly complex salmonid genomes. The assembly has a N50 of 50.98 Mb and 88.9% of the total assembled sequence length is anchored into 42 main chromosomes, of which 63.44% represents repeated contents, including 1,461,010 DNA transposons. 56,058 genes were found with the NCBI annotation pipeline, with 99% of the 3,640 expected conserved orthologs BUSCO genes (actinopterygii_odb10 lineage database). Additionally, we found significant homology within the 42 chromosomes, as expected for this pseudo-tetraploid species, as well as with the sister species lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) and Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ). This assembly will serve as a reliable genomic resource for brook trout, thus enabling a wider range of reference-based applications to support ongoing research and management decision-making for the species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth→French-language works237,207→