MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403029509 · doi:10.1364/bgpp.2024.jtu1a.18

A Free Space Optical Link Model for C-band Data and Power Transmission

2024· article· en· W4403029509 on OpenAlexaff
Idriss Amadou Ali, D. Paige Wilson, Meghan N. Beattie, Ryan Hogan, Narmada Rajaram, Ross Cheriton, Ahmad Atieh, Karin Hinzer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaOptiwave Systems (Canada)Larus Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree spaceLink (geometry)Optical linkTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceData transmissionSpace (punctuation)Power (physics)Free-space optical communicationOptical performance monitoringData link3D optical data storageElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsOptical communicationOptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsOptical fiberComputer networkEngineeringWavelength-division multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have modelled a free space optical (FSO) channel transmitting data and power at 1550 and 1520 nm, respectively, under various meteorological conditions. Quadratic Phase-Shift Keying is predicted to have the longest viable FSO range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207