SC-MAMBA2: Leveraging State-Space Models for Efficient Single-Cell Ultra-Long Transcriptome Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bstract The rapid advancement of single-cell sequencing technology has significantly deepened our understanding of cellular heterogeneity, yet it concurrently presents substantial challenges for the unified modeling of single-cell data. Simultaneously, pre-trained foundation models have achieved notable success in domains such as natural language processing and image analysis. However, extending these models to accommodate ultra-long single-cell transcriptome sequences, characterized by an extensive number of genes, remains a formidable task. In this study, we introduce SC-MAMBA2, based on the MAMBA2 architecture, meticulously designed with a bidirectional modeling approach tailored for single-cell transcriptomics data. As the first single-cell foundation model to integrate state-space models (SSMs) underlying MAMBA2 architecture, SC-MAMBA2 features over 625 million parameters, covers more than 60,000 genes, and was pre-trained on a dataset of over 57 million cells, making it the most comprehensive solution for processing ultra-long transcriptome sequences. Extensive bench-marking across a diverse array of downstream tasks consistently demonstrates that SC-MAMBA2 surpasses state-of-the-art models, delivering superior accuracy and enhanced computational efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".