MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neoliberalismo e política de educação superior: uma análise do artigo 170 em Santa Catarina

2024· article· pt· W4403034497 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCadernos de Pesquisa · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Public Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo tem como objetivo analisar a criação da política pública de educação superior instituída pelo artigo 170 da Constituição do Estado de Santa Catarina (1989), sob o aspecto do desenvolvimento da racionalidade neoliberal, por meio dos processos legislativos que lhe deram origem. O estudo relata tais processos, aborda as características e a atuação lógica normativa da racionalidade neoliberal pela perspectiva de Pierre Dardot e Christian Laval (2016) e, por fim, avalia a prática neoliberal nos processos legislativos. Considerando a natureza controversa do campo educacional, se questiona a atuação do Estado na contribuição da mercantilização da educação. O estudo tem abordagem qualitativa e fins descritivos, uma vez que apresenta sistematicamente os processos legislativos da política pública. A razão neoliberal é reconhecida na política do artigo 170 por meio da intervenção do Estado que estimula a competitividade econômica e propicia a mercantilização da educação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it