A study of the effect of coconut fiber on reinforced concrete beams subjected to combined bending and shear
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review paper examines the impact of coconut fiber reinforcement on the behavior of reinforced concrete beams subjected to combined bending and shear. Coconut fibers, also known as coir fibers, are a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to traditional steel reinforcement. The use of coconut fibers in concrete has shown promise in enhancing the ductility, energy absorption capacity, fracture resistance, and durability of concrete structures. The study highlights the mechanical properties and applications of coconut fiber reinforced concrete (CFRC) and investigates the effects of varying fiber content on concrete performance. Factors affecting the properties of fiber-reinforced concrete, such as the relative fiber matrix index, volume of fibers, aspect ratio of fibers, fiber orientation, workability, compaction, size of coarse aggregate, and mixing techniques, are also discussed. Understanding these factors is crucial for designing and constructing durable and sustainable concrete structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it