MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403041529 · doi:10.1177/13621718241285301

Weldability of new Ni-based superalloy G27: Effect of pre-weld solution annealing on the hot cracking susceptibility

2024· article· en· W4403041529 on OpenAlexaff
Achmad Ariaseta, Joel Andersson, Olanrewaju Ojo

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Technology of Welding & Joining · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersVINNOVA
KeywordsWeldabilitySuperalloyCrackingMaterials scienceMetallurgyWeldingAnnealing (glass)Composite materialMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hot cracking susceptibility of a new superalloy G27 was investigated by Varestraint weldability testing. The influence of pre-weld solution annealing conditions recommended by the alloy manufacturer to obtain different grain sizes (1010 °C/1 h, 1066 °C/0.5 h, and 1110 °C/1 h) for specific applications was studied. The fusion zone solidification cracking was independent of pre-weld solution annealing, and they are associated with the γ/Laves eutectic constituents. The solution-annealed material at 1010 °C/1 h showed the lowest extent of liquation cracking, while the 1110 °C/1 h condition was the most susceptible. The increased level of liquation cracking was primarily attributed to an increased grain size of pre-weld solution-annealed material. The heat-affected zone liquation cracking was identified to be caused by constitutional liquation of NbC and supersolidus melting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience and Technology of Welding & JoiningSame topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207