Investigation of Sonication Parameters for Large-Volume Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability Enhancement Using a Clinical-Prototype Hemispherical Phased Array
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Focused ultrasound (FUS) and microbubble (MB) exposure is a promising technique for targeted drug delivery to the brain; however, refinement of protocols suitable for large-volume treatments in a clinical setting remains underexplored. Methods: Here, the impacts of various sonication parameters on blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability enhancement and tissue damage were explored in rabbits using a clinical-prototype hemispherical phased array developed in-house, with real-time 3D MB cavitation imaging for exposure calibration. Initial experiments revealed that continuous manual agitation of MBs during infusion resulted in greater gadolinium (Gd) extravasation compared to gravity drip infusion. Subsequent experiments used low-dose MB infusion with continuous agitation and a low burst repetition frequency (0.2 Hz) to mimic conditions amenable to long-duration clinical treatments. Results: Key sonication parameters—target level (proportional to peak negative pressure), number of bursts, and burst length—significantly affected BBB permeability enhancement, with all parameters displaying a positive relationship with relative Gd contrast enhancement (p < 0.01). Even at high levels of BBB permeability enhancement, tissue damage was minimal, with low occurrences of hypointensities on T2*-weighted MRI. When accounting for relative Gd contrast enhancement, burst length had a significant impact on red blood cell extravasation detected in histological sections, with 1 ms bursts producing significantly greater levels compared to 10 ms bursts (p = 0.03), potentially due to the higher pressure levels required to generate equal levels of BBB permeability enhancement. Additionally, albumin and IgG extravasation correlated strongly with relative Gd contrast enhancement across sonication parameters, suggesting that protein extravasation can be predicted from non-invasive imaging. Conclusions: These findings contribute to the development of safer and more effective clinical protocols for FUS + MB exposure, potentially improving the efficacy of the approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".