Neural Circuitry and Therapeutic Targeting of Depressive Symptoms in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Conceptual similarities between depressive and negative symptoms complicate biomarker and intervention development. This study employed a data-driven approach to delineate the neural circuitry underlying depressive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). METHODS: Data from three studies were analyzed (157 participants with SSDs) to assess brain-behavior relationships: two neuroimaging studies and a randomized trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Partial least squares correlation (PLSC) was used to investigate associations between resting-state functional connectivity and depressive and negative symptoms. Secondary analyses of rTMS trial data (active, N=37; sham, N=33) were used to assess relationships between PLSC-derived symptom profiles and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: PLSC identified three latent variables (LVs) relating functional brain circuitry with symptom profiles. LV1 related a general depressive symptom factor with positive associations between and within the default mode network (DMN), the frontoparietal network (FPN), and the cingulo-opercular network (CON). LV2 related negative symptoms (no depressive symptoms) via negative associations, especially between the FPN and the CON, but also between the DMN and the FPN and the CON. LV3 related a guilt and early wakening depression factor via negative rather than positive associations with the DMN, FPN, and CON. The secondary visual network had a positive association with general depressive symptoms and negative associations with guilt and negative symptoms. Active (but not sham) rTMS applied bilaterally to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) reduced general depressive but not guilt-related or negative symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly differentiate the neural circuitry underlying depressive and negative symptoms, and segregated across the two-factor structure of depression in SSDs. These findings support divergent neurobiological pathways of depressive symptoms and negative symptoms in people with SSDs. As treatment options are currently limited, bilateral rTMS to the DLPFC is worth exploring further for general depressive symptoms in people with SSDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".