MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403052505 · doi:10.58931/crt.2024.1144

Sjogren’s Syndrome: Strategies for Treatment

2024· article· en· W4403052505 on OpenAlexafffund
Arthur Bookman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian rheumatology today. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
FundersUniversity of TorontoArthritis SocietyCanadian Rheumatology Association
KeywordsDermatologyMedicineSjögren syndromeIntensive care medicineImmunologyAutoimmune diseaseAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sjogren’s syndrome, characterized by dry eyes, dry mouth, and immunological hyperactivity, has been one of the most difficult rheumatic diseases to differentiate and define. After many hours of consensus group development, studies on large cohorts/registries of over 1500 patients in totality and following national, European, American, and finally consensus iterations, criteria have been agreed upon for the classification of this disease. In the final analysis, these criteria are objective and accessible for measurement, and a number of them can be documented in clinical practice. To treat Sjogren’s syndrome effectively, it is important to rely upon objective evidence with respect to the diagnosis of this disease, as well as the specific component of the condition that one is attempting to manage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian rheumatology today.Same topicSalivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsFrench-language works237,207