MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403052694 · doi:10.58931/cait.2024.4163

Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Practical Guide for the Allergist

2024· article· en· W4403052694 on OpenAlexaff
Jalal Moolji, Adil Adatia

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian allergy & immunology today. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstructive sleep apneaMedicineSleep apneaApneaPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder, affecting 15-30% of males and 10-15% of females in North America. OSA is characterized by the recurrent obstruction of the upper airway during sleep resulting in apneas and hypopneas. OSA can be diagnosed using a home sleep apnea test (i.e., a level 3 sleep study) or a polysomnogram (PSG) (i.e., a level 1 study or PSG) in a supervised sleep laboratory which quantifies the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour using the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). In broad terms, the diagnosis is made when an individual with symptoms or cardiac risk factors has an AHI of ≥5, or an asymptomatic individual has an AHI of ≥15. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is considered the first-line treatment of OSA. Other treatment options include an oral appliance called a mandibular advancement device, or multilevel surgery of the upper airway, especially uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP). Herein we review OSA in the context of conditions commonly observed in the allergy clinic, namely asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, rhinitis, and contact dermatitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian allergy & immunology today.Same topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207