Bibliographic record
Abstract
Food allergy affects approximately 7% of the Canadian population and is a lifelong diagnosis for many patients. While fatal anaphylaxis is rare, accidental exposures are common, with many accidental reactions being moderate- to-severe. The fear of severe or fatal anaphylaxis is of major concern and food allergy represents a significant burden on the life of food-allergic families. Until recently, the standard of care for food allergy management in North America included avoidance of the allergenic food and epinephrine autoinjector carriage. However, additional proactive therapeutic options are becoming increasingly more commonplace. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been investigated through real worl evidence and in phase II and III clinical trials. Canadian experience with OIT is increasing with the publication of guidelines to support this clinical activity. OIT is an elective, non-curative procedure which carries a risk of allergic reaction. Comprehensive and effective education for families to ensure informed consent is essential as part of the shared decision making (SDM) process and is key to successful OIT implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".