MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403055716 · doi:10.3114/fuse.2025.15.03

Novel amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers for typing medically relevant Fusarium and allied fusarioid genera

2024· article· en· W4403055716 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ruan Campos Monteiro, Choon-Bal Yu, Somayeh Dolatabadi, Ferry Hagen, Marcelo Sandoval‐Denis, P.W. Crous, Matthew C. Fisher, Sarah Santos Gonçalves, Zoilo Pires dè Camargo, Ana Luísa Höfling-Lima, Ana María Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueFungal Systematics and Evolution · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorWellcome TrustMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsAmplified fragment length polymorphismGeneticsBiologyTypingPolymorphism (computer science)Fragment (logic)Computational biologyGenotypeMedicineGeneGenetic diversityComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fusariosis is an emerging mycosis caused by diverse Fusarium and allied fusarioid genera that are characterized by spindle-shaped macroconidia. These fungi possess a broad ecological distribution, causing infections in a wide diversity of hosts, spanning the animal and plant kingdoms. The spectrum of human fusariosis encompasses superficial lesions like keratitis and onychomycosis to invasive fungal diseases. Notable genera within the medically relevant fusarioid group include Neocosmospora , Fusarium s. str. , and Bisifusarium . While Neocosmospora species (formerly F. solani species complex) are primary causative agents of human fusariosis, instances involving Fusarium s. str. and Bisifusarium (formerly F. dimerum species complex) have been reported. There is an urgent need for DNA-based markers to explore the epidemiology of these emerging fusarioid pathogens using molecular methods. We took advantage of fusarioid genomes available in NCBI (n = 20) to optimize the development of novel amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers by conducting in-depth in silico analyses to refine their applicability for studies on these pathogens’ genetic epidemiology. In-silico screening highlighted eight primer pair combinations (C1–C8) to be tested in vitro . The AFLP protocol was used for genotyping 40 medically relevant fusarioid fungi. Based on the overall scored AFLP markers (77–93 fragments), the values of polymorphism information content ( PIC = 0.3474–0.3725), marker index ( MI = 0.0038–0.0056), effective multiplex ratio ( E = 26.3750–40.4750), resolving power ( Rp = 40.1500–54.6000), discriminating power ( D = 0.7978–0.8857), expected heterozygosity ( H = 0.4476–0.4949), and mean heterozygosity ( Havp = 0.0001) demonstrated the utility of these primer combinations for discriminating Neocosmospora, Fusarium s. str. , and Bisifusarium species. Of relevance, some AFLP panels were better than others at studying genetic trends in Neocosmospora (#2 EcoRI-AT/MseI-TA, #3 EcoRI-AA/MseI-TT, and #5 EcoRI-AT/MseI-AG) or Fusarium s. str. (mainly #2 EcoRI-AT/MseI-TA and #6 EcoRI-GA/MseI-TT) and Bisifusarium (#1 EcoRI-GA/MseI-AG and #6 EcoRI-GA/MseI-TT), and these combinations will better resolve disease transmission routes. Our DNA fingerprint assay has proven effective by exhibiting rapidity, reproducibility, and high discriminatory capabilities, which represents a valuable asset in the ongoing efforts to combat fusariosis and enhance our scientific understanding of medically relevant Fusarium and allied fusarioid genera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFungal Systematics and EvolutionSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207