MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403059059 · doi:10.58931/crt.2024.1145

Updates in Treatment of Refractory Inflammatory Myositis

2024· article· en· W4403059059 on OpenAlexaff
Kun Huang, A Pye

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian rheumatology today. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General HospitalSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyositisRefractory (planetary science)MedicineIntensive care medicineDermatologyInternal medicineBiologyAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Idiopathic immune myopathies (IIM), also known as myositis, are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with varying phenotypes, prognoses, and treatment responses. They are primarily characterized by muscle inflammation, however, many patients have extramuscular involvement including skin rash, arthritis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), cardiomyopathy, and gastrointestinal dysmotility. The discovery of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) has been a major advancement in the field of IIMs, shaping the new landscape of the clinical, phenotypical, histological, and serological correlations. Based on this discovery, IIM can be more specifically classified into dermatomyositis (DM) (including amyopathic DM), antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), polymyositis (PM), and overlap myositis (OM). An increasing number of histological studies have revealed a misdiagnosis of PM because many patients who were previously diagnosed with PM were later reclassified to other forms of IIM, including IBM, IMNM, ASyS, or DM without a rash.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian rheumatology today.Same topicInflammatory Myopathies and DermatomyositisFrench-language works237,207