A Dual-Branch Cross-Modality-Attention Network for Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis Based on Ultrasound Images and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Videos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been extensively employed as an imaging modality in thyroid nodule diagnosis due to its capacity to visualise the distribution and circulation of micro-vessels in organs and lesions in a non-invasive manner. However, current CEUS-based thyroid nodule diagnosis methods suffered from: 1) the blurred spatial boundaries between nodules and other anatomies in CEUS videos, and 2) the insufficient representations of the local structural information of nodule tissues by the features extracted only from CEUS videos. In this paper, we propose a novel dual-branch network with a cross-modality-attention mechanism for thyroid nodule diagnosis by integrating the information from tow related modalities, i.e., CEUS videos and ultrasound image. The mechanism has two parts: US-attention-from-CEUS transformer (UAC-T) and CEUS-attention-from-US transformer (CAU-T). As such, this network imitates the manner of human radiologists by decomposing the diagnosis into two correlated tasks: 1) the spatio-temporal features extracted from CEUS are hierarchically embedded into the spatial features extracted from US with UAC-T for the nodule segmentation; 2) the US spatial features are used to guide the extraction of the CEUS spatio-temporal features with CAU-T for the nodule classification. The two tasks are intertwined in the dual-branch end-to-end network and optimized with the multi-task learning (MTL) strategy. The proposed method is evaluated on our collected thyroid US-CEUS dataset. Experimental results show that our method achieves the classification accuracy of 86.92%, specificity of 66.41%, and sensitivity of 97.01%, outperforming the state-of-the-art methods. As a general contribution in the field of multi-modality diagnosis of diseases, the proposed method has provided an effective way to combine static information with its related dynamic information, improving the quality of deep learning based diagnosis with an additional benefit of explainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".