Immiscible non-Newtonian displacement flows in stationary and axially rotating pipes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine immiscible displacement flows in stationary and rotating pipes, at a fixed inclination angle in a density-unstable configuration, using a viscoplastic fluid to displace a less viscous Newtonian fluid. We employ non-intrusive experimental methods, such as camera imaging, planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), and ultrasound Doppler velocimetry (UDV). We analyze the impact of key dimensionless numbers, including the imposed Reynolds numbers (Re, Re*), rotational Reynolds number (Rer), capillary number (Ca), and viscosity ratio (M), on flow patterns, regime classifications, regime transition boundaries, interfacial instabilities, and displacement efficiency. Our experiments demonstrate distinct immiscible displacement flow patterns in stationary and rotating pipes. In stationary pipes, heavier fluids slump underneath lighter ones, resulting in lift-head and wavy interface stratified flows, driven by gravity. Decreasing M slows the interface evolution and reduces its front velocity, while increasing Re* shortens the thin layer of the interface tail. In rotating pipes, the interplay between viscous, rotational, and capillary forces generates swirling slug flows with stable, elongated, and chaotic sub-regimes. Progressively, decreasing M leads to swirling dispersed droplet flow, swirling fragmented flow, and, eventually, swirling bulk flow. The interface dynamics, such as wave formations and velocity profiles, is influenced by rotational forces and inertial effects, with Fourier analysis showing the dependence of the interfacial front velocity's dominant frequency on Re and Rer. Finally, UDV measurements reveal the existence/absence of countercurrent flows in stationary/rotating pipes, while PLIF results provide further insight into droplet formation and concentration field behavior at the pipe center plane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".