A Sustainable Agri-Photovoltaic Greenhouse for Lettuce Production in Qatar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Qatar identified that food supply security, including self-sufficiency in vegetable production and increasing sustainable renewable energy generation, is important for increasing economic and environmental resiliency. Very favorable solar energy resources in Qatar suggest opportunities to simultaneously meet this goal by integrating solar energy generation and food production. This study examines the feasibility of developing a sustainable agri-photovoltaic (APV) greenhouse design. A comprehensive greenhouse with solar energy generation included is developed for year-round operation in Lusail, Qatar. The performance of the system is predicted by integrating meteorological data and MATLAB simulations of system components. Important design considerations included optimizing solar energy generation by fixed solar photovoltaic panels placed on the maximum available surface area of the greenhouse canopy, while balancing crop insolation and energy needs for greenhouse HVAC systems. Electrical energy is also stored in an industrial battery. Results suggest the APV greenhouse is technically and economically viable and that it could provide benefits, including enhancing food security, promoting renewable energy, and contributing to sustainable food and energy production in Qatar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".