MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403071576 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.646

B-289 Assessing the Shift in Positivity Rates of Cocaine and Its Metabolites in a Community Based Population: A Transition from utilization of Cutoff Concentrations to Qualitative Structure Identification

2024· article· en· W4403071576 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole White-Al Habeeb, Keni Bernardin, S. Miles Standish, K. Stanley, Emily Ang, Peter Catomeris, Thérèse Dunn, Huilin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsBrampton Civic Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCutoffIdentification (biology)Transition (genetics)PopulationQualitative analysisQualitative researchMedicinePsychologyChemistrySociologyBiologyEnvironmental healthPhysicsBiochemistrySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Semi-quantitative cutoff concentrations have traditionally been employed for urine drug detection. Research suggests that these cutoffs may be set too high, leading to the risk of overlooking positive cases. The advent of liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HR/MS) technology allows for the detection of drugs at lower concentrations. This study aims to assess the impact of transitioning from cutoff concentrations to qualitative structure identification on the positivity rates of cocaine and its metabolites in a community-based population. Methods Data analysis was conducted on results obtained from a community laboratory from April 2021 to October 2023. Screening of drugs was carried out using the Sciex X500R QTOF MS System. Cutoff concentrations were applied from April 2021 to September 2022 for screening cocaine and its metabolites (benzoylecgonine, norcocaine, and cocaethylene) in 62,816 samples. From October 2022 to October 2023, a qualitative structure identification approach was adopted for screening 47,676 samples. Results The previous screening for cocaine, benzoylecgonine, norcocaine, and cocaethylene was performed with a cutoff concentration of 50 ng/mL. Employing a qualitative structure identification approach, cocaine, benzoylecgonine, and cocaethylene were detectable at 5 ng/mL, while norcocaine could be identified at 10 ng/mL. Consequently, when qualitative identification was applied, the positivity rates for cocaine and its metabolites showed an increase. The prevalence of cocaine and its metabolites in the positive samples also demonstrated a corresponding shift. Conclusions Moving from using cutoff concentrations to employing qualitative structure identification with LC-HR/MS markedly enhances the detection of positive cases for cocaine and its metabolites. Although the detection sensitivity of drugs is improved, the presence of drugs at low concentrations can pose challenges with interpretation of results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.275
GPT teacher head0.579
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207