Behavioral and Psychological Determinants of Cryptocurrency Investment: Expanding UTAUT with Perceived Enjoyment and Risk Factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With their potential for high returns and expanding role in the financial landscape, cryptocurrency investments have garnered the attention of the financial press and investors. Applying an integrated research model based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), this study investigates the factors influencing individual investors’ attitudes toward cryptocurrency investments and their intention to continue investing. The model incorporates constructs such as performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, perceived risk, perceived privacy, technology competency, perceived enjoyment, and prior experience. Data from 506 cryptocurrency investors located in the United States were collected through a 50-item questionnaire. The findings indicate that performance expectancy and perceived enjoyment positively impact attitudes toward cryptocurrency investments, which, in turn, influence the intention to continue investing. Perceived privacy positively affects performance expectancy, while technology competency enhances effort expectancy. These results offer valuable insights for policymakers and cryptocurrency exchanges to foster sustainable growth in the cryptocurrency market. Despite its contributions, the study acknowledges limitations, including a focus on current investors in the US and the exclusion of factors such as optimism and innovativeness. Future research should explore these aspects across different populations and regions to gain a more comprehensive understanding of cryptocurrency investment behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".