A clinical case of successful treatment of the dry form of age-related macular degeneratio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the clinical case is an example of the effectiveness of low-energy pulsed chromatic LED therapy of green (505 nm), red (625 nm) and infrared (940 nm) ranges in the treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration, which was performed with the Spektra Light device (Version MARK III, Vision AidInc., Canada). The patient was examined before treatment, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment: visual acuity was determined, optical coherence tomography of the macular zone was performed, and the optical density of the macular pigment of both eyes was determined by heterochromatic flicker photometry using a Maculux praxis densitometer (Germany, Ebiga VISION GmbH). In a patient with age-related macular degeneration, after two short-term courses (2 sessions per day with a 5-minute break for 5 days) of low-energy LED therapy, visual acuity increased, the optical density of the macular pigment increased, and positive dynamics was noted in the scans of optical coherence tomography of the macular zone of the retina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".