MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403074690 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38866

Induction cladding of alloys and metal-matrix composite coatings: A review

2024· review· en· W4403074690 on OpenAlex
Jing Yu, Shuai Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Treatment and Coatings
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSt. Thomas UniversityShantou University
KeywordsComposite numberMaterials scienceCladding (metalworking)Metal matrix compositeMetallurgyMatrix (chemical analysis)MetalComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Induction cladding is a promising surface technology that combines the advantages of surface coatings and induction heating. It is an energy-efficient, environment-friendly, and cost-effective method that facilitates the fabrication of coatings with controllable thicknesses and ensures metallurgical bonding between the coating and the substrate. Owing to the high power-conversion efficiency of helical coil, induction cladding is particularly adaptable for the application of coatings on long shafts and rod parts, which find widespread use in mining and energy machinery. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art methods in induction cladding. Herein we focus on its mechanisms, cladding process and parameters, commonly used materials, simulations, innovative induction cladding technologies, industrial applications, problems, and future developments in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it