MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403075406 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.498

Tensor Train Discrete Grid-Based Filters: Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality

2024· article· en· W4403075406 on OpenAlex
Jakub Matoušek, M. Brandner, Jindřich Duník, Ivo Punĉochář

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurse of dimensionalityCurseTensor (intrinsic definition)GridComputer scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the state estimation of stochastic systems and examines the possible employment of tensor decompositions in grid-based filtering routines, in particular, the tensor-train decomposition. The aim is to show that these techniques can lead to a massive reduction in both the computational and storage complexity of grid-based filtering algorithms without considerable tradeoffs in accuracy. This claim is supported by an algorithm descriptions and numerical illustrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it