MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403075406 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.498

Tensor Train Discrete Grid-Based Filters: Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality

2024· article· en· W4403075406 on OpenAlexaff
Jakub Matoušek, M. Brandner, Jindřich Duník, Ivo Punĉochář

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurse of dimensionalityCurseTensor (intrinsic definition)GridComputer scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the state estimation of stochastic systems and examines the possible employment of tensor decompositions in grid-based filtering routines, in particular, the tensor-train decomposition. The aim is to show that these techniques can lead to a massive reduction in both the computational and storage complexity of grid-based filtering algorithms without considerable tradeoffs in accuracy. This claim is supported by an algorithm descriptions and numerical illustrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicTensor decomposition and applicationsFrench-language works237,207