Analisis Penerapan Akuntansi Lingkungan Terhadap Pengendalian Biaya Operasional Pengelolaan Limbah pada Rumah Sakit Karya Husada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to find out how environmental accounting is applied to control operational costs for waste management at Karya Husada Hospital. This research was conducted using qualitative methods. Data sources use primary data and secondary data. The data analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative using the Miles and Huberman model. The results of this research show that Karya Husada Hospital has managed its waste well, this is proven by the absence of problems or complaints from the surrounding community regarding waste at the hospital. Karya Husada Hospital has implemented environmental accounting and carried out the process of Recognizing, Measuring, Recording, Presenting, and also Disclosure of environmental related costs. Karya Husada Hospital does not have a specific environmental cost report. Controlling operational costs for waste management at Karya Husada Hospital has not been effective, where there has been a deviation from realized costs exceeding previously budgeted costs. This deviation occurred because the amount of medical and domestic waste increased along with the increase in patient and family visits at Karya Husada Hospital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it