MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403079580 · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1483431

Salvia miltiorrhiza in osteoporosis: a review of its phytochemistry, traditional clinical uses and preclinical studies (2014–2024)

2024· review· en· W4403079580 on OpenAlexaff
Lili Wang, Shan Wang, Xuan Dai, Gaiyue Yue, Jiyuan Yin, Tianshu Xu, Hanfen Shi, Tianyuan Liu, Zhanhong Jia, Dieter Brömme, Shuofeng Zhang, Dongwei Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Pharmacology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBone Metabolism and Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhytochemistrySalvia miltiorrhizaTraditional medicineMedicinePreclinical researchOsteoporosisPharmacologyAlternative medicineTraditional Chinese medicineMedical physicsInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoporosis becomes a global public health concern due to its rising prevalence and substantial impact on life quality. Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Salviae Miltiorrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, SM) has been firstly recorded in Shen Nong's Herbal Classic, and is frequently prescribed in conjunction with other herbs for the management of osteoporosis. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze the recent advances of SM on osteoporosis in traditional Chinese clinical uses and preclinical investigations. Literature encompassing pertinent studies were systematically retrieved across multiple databases, including the PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese VIP Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Original investigations spanning from February 2014 to March 2024, including traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical trials and preclinical studies, were employed to analyze the effects and actions of SM on osteoporosis. Thirty-eight TCM clinical trials were identified to employ SM in combination with other herbs for the management of primary and secondary osteoporosis. The overall efficacy was between 77% and 96.67%. Forty preclinical studies were identified to investigate the effects and actions of SM and/or its ingredients on osteoporosis. The anti-osteoporosis actions of this herb may be attributed to inhibit osteoclastogenesis/bone resorption and promote osteoblastogenesis/osteogenesis. The ethanol extracts and its ingredients (tanshinones) inhibit osteoclastogenesis/bone resorption by inhibiting the MAPK/NF-κB/NFATc1 signaling pathway and cathepsin K-induced collagen degradation. Both ethanol extracts (tanshinones) and water extracts (Sal B and tanshinol) contribute to osteoblastogenesis by promoting osteogenesis and angiogenesis via activation of the Wnt/β-catenin/VEGF and ERK/TAZ pathways, and eliminating ROS production targeting Nrf2/ARE/HO-1 pathway. In conclusions, SM may offer a novel strategy for osteoporosis management. Well-designed clinical trials are still needed to evaluate the actions of this herb and its ingredients on bone remodeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PharmacologySame topicBone Metabolism and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207