Exploring youth sport participation and parental perceptions of social support
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to test whether having adolescents involved in sport leads to increased social support among parents. Using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children with 3102 primary (Mage = 43.04, SD = 8.75) and 2523 secondary parents (Mage = 46.13, SD = 6.16), differences between social support perceptions across sport participation categories (team-only, individual-only, both, or no-sport) were tested. We tested whether the number of days parents’ adolescents spent involved in sport per week, and the number of hours adolescents spent in sport during a typical day predicted parental social support. Primary parents with adolescents involved in team-sport only or both types of sport reported stronger perceptions of social support than primary parents of non-participants. The number of weekly days parents’ adolescents spent involved in sport activities positively predicted social support among primary parents. No significant effects among secondary parents were found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".