MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403091121 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.083510

SPT clusters with DES and HST weak lensing. II. Cosmological constraints from the abundance of massive halos

2024· article· en· W4403091121 on OpenAlexaff
S. Bocquet, S. Grandis, L. E. Bleem, Matthias Klein, J. J. Mohr, T. Schrabback, T. M. C. Abbott, P. A. R. Ade, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam, S. W. Allen, O. Alves, A. Amon, A. J. Anderson, J. Annis, B. Ansarinejad, Jason E. Austermann, S. Àvila, D. Bacon, M. Bayliss, J. A. Beall, K. Bechtol, M. R. Becker, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, G. M. Bernstein, S Bhargava, F. Bianchini, M. Brodwin, D. Brooks, Lincoln Bryant, A. Campos, R. E. A. Canning, J. E. Carlstrom, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, R. Cawthon, C. L. Chang, C. Chang, P. Chaubal, R Chen, H. C. Chiang, A. Choi, T.-L. Chou, R. Citron, C. Corbett Moran, J. Cordero, M. Costanzi, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, L. N. da Costa, M. E. S. Pereira, C. Davis, T. M. Davis, J. DeRose, S. Desai, T. de Haan, H. T. Diehl, M. Dobbs, Scott Dodelson, C. Doux, A. Drlica-Wagner, K. Eckert, J. Elvin-Poole, S. Everett, W. Everett, I. Ferrero, A. Ferté, A. M. Flores, J. Frieman, Jason Gallicchio, J. García-Bellido, M. Gatti, E. M. George, G. Giannini, Michael D. Gladders, D. Gruen, R. A. Gruendl, N. Gupta, G. Gutierrez, N. W. Halverson, I. Harrison, W. G. Hartley, K. Herner, S. R. Hinton, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, K. Honscheid, J. D. Hrubes, N. Huang, Johannes Hubmayr, Eric Huff, Dragan Huterer, K. D. Irwin, D. J. James, Mike Jarvis, Gourav Khullar, K. Kim, L. Knox, Ralph Kraft, E. Krause, K. Kuehn, N. Kuropatkin, F. Kéruzoré, O. Lahav, A. T. Lee, P.-F. Léget, D. Li, H. L. Lin, A. E. Lowitz, N. MacCrann, Guillaume Mahler, A. Mantz, J. L. Marshall, J. McCullough, M. McDonald, J. J. McMahon, J. Mena-Fernández, F. Menanteau, S. S. Meyer, R. Miquel, J. Montgomery, J. Myles, T. Natoli, A Navarro-Alsina, J. P. Nibarger, G. I. Noble, V. Novosad, R. L. C. Ogando, Y. Omori, S. Padin, Sahil Pandey, P. Paschos, S. Patil, A. Pieres, A. Porredon, J. Prat, C. Pryke, M. Raveri, C. L. Reichardt, Joseph Roberson, R. P. Rollins, C. Romero, A. Roodman, J. E. Ruhl, E. S. Rykoff, B. R. Saliwanchik, L. Salvati, C. Sánchez, E. Sánchez, D. Sanchez Cid, A. Saro, K. K. Schaffer, L. F. Secco, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, K. Sharon, E. Sheldon, T. Shin, C. Sievers, Graeme Smecher, M. Smith, Taweewat Somboonpanyakul, Martin W. Sommer, B. Stalder, A. A. Stark, J. B. Stephen, V. Strazzullo, G. Tarlé, C. To, M. A. Troxel, C. Tucker, I. Tutusaus, T. N. Varga, Todd Veach, J. D. Vieira, A. Vikhlinin, Anja von der Linden, N. Weaverdyck, J. Weller, Nathan Whitehorn, W. L. K. Wu, B. Yanny, V. Yefremenko, B. Yin, Matthew Young, J. A. Zebrowski, Y Zhang, H. Zohren, J. Zuntz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsThree-Speed Logic (Canada)Institute of Particle PhysicsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of WaterlooCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcGill University
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryAstrophysics DivisionHigh Energy PhysicsDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean Research CouncilMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoScience and Technology Facilities CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroKavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of ChicagoUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und EnergieLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia: Física Nuclear e AplicaçõesConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoGeneralitat de CatalunyaOffice of ScienceUniversity of EdinburghInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesSpace Telescope Science InstituteUniversity of SussexMinistarstvo znanosti i obrazovanjaUniversity of CambridgeBundesministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und TechnologieDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaAustralian Research CouncilKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteUniversity of PortsmouthFermilabTexas A and M UniversityOhio State UniversityHigher Education Funding Council for EnglandComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaUniversity College LondonMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación ProductivaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationStanford UniversityFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of NottinghamEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichNational Centre for Supercomputing ApplicationsNational Science FoundationUniversity of MichiganMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionÖsterreichische ForschungsförderungsgesellschaftUniversity of California
KeywordsHaloAbundance (ecology)AstrophysicsWeak gravitational lensingPhysicsEcologyGalaxyBiologyRedshift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In these two papers, the authors use mock maps to establish a method for studying the abundance and calibrating the weak-lensing based mass of galaxy clusters. They set up a likelihood function, thus obtaining cosmological constraints from a sample of 1,005 clusters detected with the South Pole Telescope, in combination with further cluster data from the Dark Energy Survey, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, and the Hubble Space Telescope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207