Le revenu universel jugé à l’aune de la solidarité radicale de Paulo Freire et bell hooks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article retrace les caractéristiques de la solidarité radicale exposées dans les deux ouvrages majeurs des pédagogues critiques Paulo Freire et bell hooks, Pédagogie des opprimés et De la marge au centre : théorie féministe . Ces auteurs livrent une version très politique de la solidarité : inscrite dans un contexte de lutte sociale, elle correspond aux liens qui se tissent entre les personnes engagées pour l’« humanisation ». Précisant ainsi un horizon d’émancipation précieux que l’on pourrait estimer aujourd’hui perdu de vue, Freire et hooks notent que ceux qui s’y reconnaîtraient ont à charge de créer les conditions d’un dialogue sincère entre les personnes – opprimées et alliées – unies dans ce combat. En dessinant les contours de cette solidarité radicale, je dispose d’un horizon normatif critique à l’aune duquel juger mon objet de recherche, le revenu universel. J’en conclus que radicaliser cette forme de solidarité nécessiterait notamment de la repolitiser en assumant clairement sa fonction émancipatrice aux niveaux individuels et collectifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".