Konstruksi Makna Terkait Country Of Origin Brand Skintific Pada Komunitas Siber “X”
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2023, there was a heated discussion regarding the issue that Skintific is not actually a product from Canada, despite its claim of being "Formulated in Canada," but is instead made in China. This issue gained traction on social media, particularly on X/Twitter, prompting a wide range of responses. This research was conducted to understand the meanings attributed by the X cyber community to the brand's country of origin. The study used netnography to deconstruct the norms influencing the decision-making of the group under study. Although some consumers were confused about the product's country of origin, this did not diminish their satisfaction with the product's effects on their skin. However, the majority of the online community expressed skepticism about the "Formulated in Canada" claim, which led to distrust, as the product is actually made in China. This was seen as a misleading marketing practice, resulting in dissatisfaction and disappointment among consumers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it