MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403094294 · doi:10.1109/tasc.2024.3473850

2-D Thin-Shell Model Based on the $H$-$\phi$-Formulation for Modeling HTS Tapes in COMSOL Multiphysics

2024· article· en· W4403094294 on OpenAlexafffund
Bruno de Sousa Alves, A. Larry Arsenault, Frédéric Sirois

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersInstitut TransMedTechCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsMultiphysicsShell (structure)Materials scienceFinite element methodPhysicsComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a finite-element thin-shell (TS) model and its application to 2-D electromagnetic problems involving superconducting tapes in COMSOL Multiphysics. The magnetic scalar potential ($\phi$) is the state variable in nonconducting regions surrounding of the tapes, which are represented as zero thickness objects in the calculus domain. Inside the tapes, an auxiliary 1-D problem formulated in terms of the tangential components of the magnetic field ($H$) takes into account the physics across their thickness. The final finite-element system of equations includes both the 2-D and 1-D discretized equations, which are solved simultaneously in a fully coupled manner and transparently for the user. The use of thin cuts is required to impose transport currents in the tapes. This procedure allows the simulation of problems comprising superconducting tapes in any geometrical configuration. We demonstrate that both the normal and tangential fields agree well with reference solutions obtained with the widely used$T$-$A$-formulation and with the more standard$H$- and$H$-$\phi$-formulations with a full 2-D discretization of the tapes. The proposed$H$-$\phi$TS model estimates ac losses accurately while speeding up simulations. This makes this model ideal for simulating large-scale superconducting devices in 2-D, particularly when they comprise compact arrangements of high-temperature superconductor tapes carrying antiparallel currents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Applied SuperconductivitySame topicSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207