MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403094348 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2024.3425515

Energy-Efficient Route Navigation (Eco-Routing) for Electric Vehicles in SUMO

2024· article· en· W4403094348 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Insaf Sagaama, Amine Kchiche, Wassim Trojet, Farouk Kamoun

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diffusion of electric vehicles (EVs) is recently gaining great attention in the road transport and automotive sectors as an attempt to bring in an emission-free world. EVs are considered a key to future clean transportation systems. However, these vehicles still suffer from limited battery capacity and range anxiety. Therefore, EVs manufacturers are focusing on reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions. In addition, research in the context of intelligent transportation systems embedding information and communication technologies are focusing on the optimization of the energy consumption as a valuable solution to foster the wide diffusion of EVs. In this article, we propose a simulation platform for eco-routing services based on estimating EV energy consumption to provide the most energy-efficient routes for the EV while traveling. We provide an energy map that can be used for eco-routing through a real-time data collection of the EV energy consumption. The energy map was established in the traffic simulator Simulation of Urban MObility (SUMO) to show the efficiency of the proposed eco-routing strategy compared to the other strategies based on establishing the fastest routes. This map will be exploited as good support, in the future, for advanced research on the EV concept.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207