MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403096596 · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107474

Beamforming-integrated neural networks for ultrasound imaging

2024· article· en· W4403096596 on OpenAlexafffund
Di Xiao, Alfred C. H. Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasonics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsResearch Institute for AgingUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyE.W.R. Steacie Memorial Fund
KeywordsBeamformingUltrasound imagingUltrasoundArtificial neural networkComputer scienceAcousticsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Beamforming-integrated neural network (BINN) is a new informed machine learning architecture for ultrasound imaging. • BINN enables ultrasound images to be rationally inferred directly from pre-beamforming radiofrequency (RF) datasets. • BINN works by embedding delay-and-sum (DAS) as a sparse matrix beamforming (SMB) layer within the neural network. • 22-183 ms training times and 4-25 ms inference times for multiple batch sizes (1, 4, 12) indicate tractability of our approach. • BINN showed efficacy in inferring high-quality B-mode images in single-shot plane-wave ultrasound imaging in vivo . Sparse matrix beamforming (SMB) is a computationally efficient reformulation of delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming as a single sparse matrix multiplication. This reformulation can potentially dovetail with machine learning platforms like TensorFlow and PyTorch that already support sparse matrix operations. In this work, using SMB principles, we present the development of beamforming-integrated neural networks (BINNs) that can rationally infer ultrasound images directly from pre-beamforming channel-domain radiofrequency (RF) datasets. To demonstrate feasibility, a toy BINN was first designed with two 2D-convolution layers that were respectively placed both before and after an SMB layer. This toy BINN correctly updated kernel weights in all convolution layers, demonstrating efficiency in both training (PyTorch – 133 ms, TensorFlow – 22 ms) and inference (PyTorch – 4 ms, TensorFlow – 5 ms). As an application demonstration, another BINN with two RF-domain convolution layers, an SMB layer, and three image-domain convolution layers was designed to infer high-quality B-mode images in vivo from single-shot plane-wave channel RF data. When trained using 31-angle compounded plane wave images (3000 frames from 22 human volunteers), this BINN showed mean-square logarithmic error improvements of 21.3 % and 431 % in the inferred B-mode image quality respectively comparing to an image-to-image convolutional neural network (CNN) and an RF-to-image CNN with the same number of layers and learnable parameters (3,777). Overall, by including an SMB layer to adopt prior knowledge of DAS beamforming, BINN shows potential as a new type of informed machine learning framework for ultrasound imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasonicsSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207