Placental extracellular vesicles promote cardiomyocyte maturation and fetal heart development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Congenital heart defects are leading causes of neonatal mortality and are often associated with placental abnormalities, but mechanisms linking placenta and heart development are poorly understood. Herein, we investigated a potential signaling network connecting the placenta and nascent heart in mice. We found that fetal hearts exposed to media conditioned by placental tissue or differentiated wild-type trophoblast stem (TS) cells, but not undifferentiated TS cells, showed increased heart rate and epicardial cell outgrowth. This effect was not observed when hearts were exposed to media from TS cells lacking OVO-Like 2, a transcription factor required for trophoblast differentiation and placental development. Trophoblasts released abundant extracellular vesicles into media, and these vesicles were sufficient to mediate cardio-promoting effects. Our findings provide a potential mechanism whereby the placenta communicates with the fetal heart to promote cardiac morphogenesis, and offers insight into the link between poor placentation and a higher incidence of heart defects. Poor development of the placenta is linked with heart problems. This study reveals that extracellular vesicles from placental trophoblasts promote heart development in mice, shedding light on how placental health affects cardiac formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".