MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403103209 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52087-x

Concordant inter-laboratory derived concentrations of ceramides in human plasma reference materials via authentic standards

2024· article· en· W4403103209 on OpenAlexaff
Federico Torta, Nils Hoffmann, Bo Burla, Irina Alecu, Makoto Arita, Takeshi Bamba, Steffany A. L. Bennett, Justine Bertrand‐Michel, Britta Brügger, Mónica P. Cala, Dolores Camacho‐Muñoz, Antonio Checa, Michael Chen, Michaela Chocholoušková, Michelle Cinel, Emeline Chu‐Van, Benoît Colsch, Cristina Coman, Lisa Connell, Bebiana C. Sousa, Alex M. Dickens, Maria Fedorova, Finnur Freyr Eiríksson, Héctor Gallart‐Ayala, Mohan Ghorasaini, Martin Giera, Xue Li Guan, Mark Haid, Thomas Hankemeier, Amy C. Harms, Marcus Höring, Michal Holčapek, Thorsten Hornemann, Chunxiu Hu, Andreas J. Hülsmeier, Kevin Huynh, Christina M. Jones, Julijana Ivanišević, Yoshihiro Izumi, Harald Köfeler, Sin Man Lam, Mike Lange, Jong Cheol Lee, Gerhard Liebisch, Katrice A. Lippa, Andrea F. Lopez‐Clavijo, Malena Manzi, Manuela Martinefski, Raviswamy G H Math, Satyajit Mayor, Peter J. Meikle, Marı́a Eugenia Monge, Myeong Hee Moon, Sneha Muralidharan, Anna Nicolaou, Thao Nguyen-Tran, Valerie B. O’Donnell, Matej Orešič, Arvind Ramanathan, Fabien Riols, Daisuke Saigusa, Tracey B. Schock, Heidi Schwartz, Guanghou Shui, Madhulika Singh, Masatomo Takahashi, Margrét Þorsteinsdóttir, Noriyuki Tomiyasu, Anthony Tournadre, Hiroshi Tsugawa, Victoria J. Tyrrell, Grace van der Gugten, Michael J.O. Wakelam, Craig E. Wheelock, Denise Wolrab, Guowang Xu, Tianrun Xu, John A. Bowden, Kim Ekroos, Robert Ahrends, Markus R. Wenk

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilAgence Nationale de la RechercheNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsHuman plasmaPlasmaChemistryEnvironmental chemistryChromatographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this community effort, we compare measurements between 34 laboratories from 19 countries, utilizing mixtures of labelled authentic synthetic standards, to quantify by mass spectrometry four clinically used ceramide species in the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) human blood plasma Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1950, as well as a set of candidate plasma reference materials (RM 8231). Participants either utilized a provided validated method and/or their method of choice. Mean concentration values, and intra- and inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated using single-point and multi-point calibrations, respectively. These results are the most precise (intra-laboratory CVs ≤ 4.2%) and concordant (inter-laboratory CVs < 14%) community-derived absolute concentration values reported to date for four clinically used ceramides in the commonly analyzed SRM 1950. We demonstrate that calibration using authentic labelled standards dramatically reduces data variability. Furthermore, we show how the use of shared RM can correct systematic quantitative biases and help in harmonizing lipidomics. Collectively, the results from the present study provide a significant knowledge base for translation of lipidomic technologies to future clinical applications that might require the determination of reference intervals (RIs) in various human populations or might need to estimate reference change values (RCV), when analytical variability is a key factor for recall during multiple testing of individuals. Here, the authors compared measurements between 34 laboratories from 19 countries, to quantify by mass spectrometry four ceramides of clinical relevance in human blood plasma Standard Reference Materials. The main goals were to evaluate concordance obtained in a large inter-laboratory trial and to report absolute concentrations of four circulating lipids in a publicly available standard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Communications→Same topicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry→French-language works237,207→