MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403106479 · doi:10.1177/23821205241286292

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Indigenous Health Curricula: Validation and Application of the NOSM CAST Instrument

2024· article· en· W4403106479 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marion Maar, Diana Urajnik, Geoffrey L. Hudson, Darrel Manitowabi, Lorrilee McGregor, Sam Senecal, Roger Strasser, Wayne Warry, Kristen Jacklin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreparednessCronbach's alphaIndigenousCurriculumMedical educationMedicineScale (ratio)Health careFamily medicinePsychologyNursingClinical psychologyPsychometricsPedagogyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES In recent years, Indigenous health curricula have been integrated into medical education in response to international calls to improve Indigenous health care. Instruments to evaluate Indigenous health education are urgently needed. We set out to validate a tool to measure self-reported medical student preparedness to provide culturally safe care to Indigenous Peoples. We then applied the tool to evaluate the effectiveness of the Northern Ontario School of Medicine University's (NOSM U) Indigenous health curriculum. METHODS We conducted psychometric testing of a 46-item draft NOSM Cultural Competency and Safety Tool (CAST). Testing included principal components analysis, subscale and item analysis, and the use of paired sample t-tests to examine pre- and posttest change to measure learner outcomes. The NOSM CAST was transposed to create a retrospective pre–posttest survey with single-point-in-time scoring. RESULTS Respondents included five cohorts of first-year undergraduate medical students, with 305 of 320 participating (response rate of 95.3%). The validated survey subscales included knowledge, confidence/preparedness, attitudes, intentions for advocacy, antidiscrimination, and self-reflective practice, measured using 36 scale items. Cronbach's alpha showed good to excellent internal consistency for the scales ( α range = 0.82–0.91). Composite reliability values were acceptable. The pre–posttest analysis showed statistically significant increases on four scales: knowledge [ t(254) = 15.10, P < .001], confidence/preparedness [ t(254) = 15.85, P < .001], intentions for advocacy [ t(251) = 3.32, P = .001], and self-reflective practice [ t(254) = 8.04, P < .001]. The largest mean increases were for knowledge ( d = 1.07) and confidence/preparedness ( d = 1.15). CONCLUSIONS The NOSM CAST tracks student progress in Indigenous health curricula. NOSM U's classroom and immersion-based Indigenous health curriculum enhanced students’ self-reported preparedness for culturally safe care. NOSM CAST implemented together with an assessment of Indigenous patient experiences with the same learners constitutes a rigorous evaluation approach to Indigenous health curricula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Education and Curricular DevelopmentSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207