MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403107037 · doi:10.31876/er.v8i4.876

Content Analysis in the Publications of the digital media CDL Noticias: An Exploratory Study

2024· article· en· W4403107037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEspirales revista multidisciplinaria de investigación · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJournalism and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExploratory analysisDigital mediaExploratory researchAdvertisingComputer scienceWorld Wide WebData scienceSociologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is an exploratory study that aims to analyze the content of local and national news published in the digital media "CDL Noticias" during the month of November 2023. In this writing, a qualitative methodology was applied, which was developed through a content analysis, seeking to understand the informative panorama of the medium and to evaluate the importance that CDL assigns to each type of content by means of an observation sheet. The results highlighted in this research made it possible to identify the predominant topics, the approaches used and the frequency with which different types of news are addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it