MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403107702 · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06833-0

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women with Ankylosing spondylitis - an evaluation of a population database

2024· article· en· W4403107702 on OpenAlexaff
Uri Amikam, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Haitham Baghlaf, Richard Brown, Michael H. Dahan

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReproductive medicineAnkylosing spondylitisPopulationPregnancyMaternal morbidityObstetricsPediatricsFamily medicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a systemic chronic rheumatic disease characterized by involvement of the axial skeletal and sacroiliac joints. Although this disease is not rare amongst women of reproductive age, data regarding pregnancy outcomes have demonstrated conflicting results. We therefore aimed to compare pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between women who suffered from AS to those who did not. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS). Included in the study were all pregnant women who delivered or had a maternal death in the US between 2004 and 2014. Women with an ICD-9 diagnosis of AS before or during pregnancy were compared to those without. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups using multivariate logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 9,096,788 women were inclusion in the analysis. Amongst them, 383 women (3.8/100,000) had a diagnosis of AS and the rest were controls. Women with AS, compared to those without, were more likely to be older; Caucasian; from higher income quartiles; suffer from thyroid disorders, and have multiple pregnancies (p < 0.001, all). After adjusting for confounders, patients in the AS group, compared to those without, had a higher rate of cesarean delivery (CD) (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.14-1.91, p = 0.003); gestational diabetes (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.33, p = 0.038); and placenta previa (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.6-8.12, p = 0.002). Regarding neonatal outcomes, patients with AS, compared to those without, had a higher rate of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates (aOR 2.19, 95% CI 1.22-3.93, p = 0.009); and intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) (aOR 3.46, 95% CI 1.11-10.83, p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Women diagnosed with AS have an increased risk of obstetric complications, including CD, as well as an increased risk of SGA and IUFD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207