Causal relationship between plasma metabolites and carpal tunnel syndrome risk: evidence from a mendelian randomization study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common symptom of nerve compression and a leading cause of pain and hand dysfunction. However, the underlying biological mechanisms are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to reveal the causal effect of circulating metabolites on susceptibility to CTS. Methods We employed various Mendelian randomization (MR) methods, including Inverse Variance Weighted, MR-Egger, Weighted Median, Simple Mode, and Weighted Model, to examine the association between 1,400 metabolites and the risk of developing CTS. We obtained Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with 1,400 metabolites from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) cohort. CTS data was derived from the FinnGen consortium, which included 11,208 cases and 1,95,047 controls of European ancestry. Results The results of the two-sample MR study indicated an association between 77 metabolites (metabolite ratios) and CTS. After false discovery rate (FDR) correction, a strong causal association between glucuronate levels (odd ratio (OR) [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.97–0.99], p FDR = 0.002), adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP) to phosphate ratio (OR [95% CI]:0.58 [0.45–0.74], p FDR = 0.009), cysteinylglycine disulfide levels (OR [95% CI]: 0.85 [0.78–0.92], p FDR = 0.047) and CTS was finally identified. Conclusion In summary, the results of this study suggest that the identified glucuronate, the ratio of AMP to phosphate, and cysteinylglycine disulfide levels can be considered as metabolic biomarkers for CTS screening and prevention in future clinical practice, as well as candidate molecules for future mechanism exploration and drug target selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".