MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403108406 · doi:10.31674/mjmr.2024.v08i03.001

The Effect of Temperature Difference in the Same Quarter on Blood Biochemical Levels in Patients with Cerebral Infarction in Northeast China and Hainan

2024· article· en· W4403108406 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Na Lu, Farra Aidah Jumuddin

Bibliographic record

VenueMalaysian Journal of Medical Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfrared Thermography in Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ChinaCerebral infarctionMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyGeographyIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The study examines the impact of temperature differences within the same season on blood biochemical levels in cerebral infarction patients in Northeast China and Hainan. To study the effect of temperature differences in the same season on blood biochemical levels in patients with cerebral infarction in Northeast China and Hainan. Methods: A total of 393 patients with cerebral infarction in a certain area of Northeast China and 343 patients with cerebral infarction in a certain area of Hainan were selected from November 2021 to March 2022, and then the general medical history data and blood biochemical test results of patients with cerebral infarction were collected. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed on the data. Results: In the same quarter, there was a significant correlation between cerebral infarction in patients in Northeast China and Hainan (OR = 0.034, p = 0.000). Gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and triglycerides are high risk factors for cerebral infarction. Conclusion: The incidence of cerebral infarction in patients in Northeast China and Hainan was significantly associated within the same quarter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMalaysian Journal of Medical ResearchSame topicInfrared Thermography in MedicineFrench-language works237,207