Growth of two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks on substrates: insight from microsecond atomistic simulations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
-phenylene on metal substrates, closely mimicking experimental conditions. Our improved approach highlights that 2D polymerization occurs through monomer addition and island coalescence, with a pre-bonding stage allowing monomers/oligomers to dynamically adjust their configurations to the expanding island structures. Our results elucidate the mechanisms underlying the formation of vacancy and dislocation defects during 2D polymerization as well as their healing processes. Overall, our findings underscore the significant roles that high surface mobility, effective monomer-substrate anchoring, high framework rigidity, moderate monomer coordination, and low bonding rate play in forming large, extended 2D crystals while suppressing vacancy and dislocation defects. We demonstrate how these factors can be tuned through substrate selection, deposition rate modulation, and temperature control, thereby offering valuable insight for strategically optimizing on-surface 2D polymerizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it