MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403115209 · doi:10.1117/12.3028152

Harnessing nonlinear broadening dynamics in single-mode fibers for neuromorphic computing

2024· article· en· W4403115209 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Chemnitz, Bennet Fischer, Yi Zhu, Mohammad Sobhi Saeed, Nicolas Perron, Imtiaz Alamgir, Piotr Roztocki, Benjamin MacLellan, Luigi DiLauro, Cristina Rimoldi, Tiago H. Falk, Roberto Morandotti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsGenia Photonics (Canada)University of WaterlooInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringNonlinear systemComputer scienceMode (computer interface)Dynamics (music)Electronic engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsArtificial neural networkAcousticsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical neuromorphic computing marks a breakthrough over traditional digital computing by offering energy-efficient, fast, and parallel processing solutions while challenges remain in incorporating nonlinearity efficiently. Leveraging nonlinear wave dynamics in optical fibers as a computational resource may provide a solution. Our research demonstrates how femtosecond pulse propagation in optical fibers can emulate neural network inference, utilizing the high phase sensitivity of broadband light for creating nonlinear input-output mappings akin to Extreme Learning Machines (ELMs). Experimental results show high classification accuracies and low RMS errors in function regression, all at pico-joule pulse energy. This indicates our method's potential to lower energy consumption for inference tasks, complementing existing spatial-mode systems. We also investigated femtosecond pulses' nonlinear broadening effects – self-phase modulation and coherent soliton fission – demonstrating their distinct impacts on classification tasks and showcasing broadband frequency generation as a powerful, energy-efficient tool for next-generation computing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207