MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403115773 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2024-0053

Mapping of fluid venting and attenuation of hydrate bearing sediments from offshore Oregon

2024· article· en· W4403115773 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Subbarao Yelisetti, Dibakar Ghosal, Lenore Perkins, R. D. Hyndman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologySubmarine pipelineGeochemistryBearing (navigation)AttenuationSeismologyOceanographyGeomorphologyMining engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we present regional high-resolution multichannel seismic reflections surveys of the accretionary sedimentary prism off the coast of Oregon where there are strong gas hydrate-associated bottom simulating reflectors (BSRs), and indications of gas and fluid venting from the seafloor. The new data from RR1718 survey conducted in 2017 as part of a chief scientist training cruise complement previous large airgun deeper-penetration reflection surveys and International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) seafloor drilling, which were mainly in the area of the mid-slope anticline, Hydrate Ridge. The BSRs are at depths of 120–310 ms (102–264 m) below the seafloor with the regional depths controlled by the landward decreasing heat flow, and shallower water depths. In some areas there are double BSRs interpreted to result from the thermal perturbation and sea level depth changes from transient uplift. Below the BSR there is frequent local brightening of the sediment stratigraphy reflectors by free gas. There are indications of fluid and methane gas venting from the seafloor that locally perturb the local thermal regime and the resulting BSR depth, and of seafloor carbonate caps. The lateral variation in amplitudes of the seafloor and BSR has been mapped in spectral decomposed iso-frequency sections. Attenuation estimates for the BSRs using peak frequency analysis indicate quality factors (inverse of attenuation) as low as 17 for a BSR below the anticline of Hydrate Ridge. The high attenuation is interpreted to be a consequence of a thick free gas layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→