MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403117748 · doi:10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100037

Ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to primary care among im/migrant communities in British Columbia, Canada

2024· article· en· W4403117748 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSM - Health Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCVancouver Foundation
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicPrimary care2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)GeographyPolitical scienceEconomic growthMedicineFamily medicineVirologyOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic changed healthcare delivery in multiple ways, including a widespread shift to virtual care. Evidence of how these changes were experienced is mixed and varies among populations and Canadian provinces. We sought to generate new information about how these changes were experienced by im/migrants in British Columbia (BC), assessing their impact on access to virtual and in-person primary care. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews in Dari, English, Farsi, Spanish, and Tigrinya with im/migrants living in BC for less than 10 years. We analyzed 50 interviews using a team-based approach to reflexive thematic analysis to explore how changes in service delivery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted im/migrant's healthcare experiences and access in BC. Interview participants described impacts of changes in service delivery in terms of accessibility, human connections, quality of care, and safety. Impacts were experienced positively as opportunities or negatively as obstacles. Experiences were shaped by immigration status, English language fluency, having a regular source of primary care before the pandemic, and economic resources. An overarching theme was trust, with healthcare experiences during the pandemic either increasing or decreasing participants’ trust in the healthcare system. Our findings reveal that within im/migrant communities, the same changes in health service delivery were experienced differently, depending on various determining factors. Whether people experienced opportunities or obstacles, and increased or decreased trust, was shaped by modifiable policies that predate the pandemic and will persist beyond the pandemic unless significant and intentional, evidence-based changes are implemented. • The same changes in healthcare were experienced differently among im/migrants interviewed. • Some experienced opportunities for accessibility, quality of care, human connection, and safety, others experienced obstacles. • Security of status, language supports, and access to regular primary care shaped experiences. • Virtual care can provide opportunities for improved access among im/migrants, when appropriately supported . • It is important to be attentive and proactive in rebuilding trust in the healthcare system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it