MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403121638 · doi:10.4050/f-0072-2016-11401

525 Hydraulic System Optimization for Fly-By-Wire Control

2016· article· en· W4403121638 on OpenAlexaff
James Sobel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsBell Helicopter Textron (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOn the flyHydraulic machineryComputer scienceControl systemEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Bell 525 is the world's first commercial helicopter to incorporate fly-by-wire flight controls. Fly-by-wire features will allow unparalleled safely and decreased pilot workload - especially for operation in austere environments. To support the unique requirements of a commercial fly-by-wire flight control system, the 525 design needed to incorporate three functionally identical, separate and continuously operating hydraulic systems. Any one system is independently capable of sustaining continued safe flight in the unlikely event that two systems become inoperative. The hydraulic system architecture incorporates complete system separation so that a hydraulic failure in one hydraulic system can not affect the other systems. To ensure that the flight control systems operate within required tolerances, thermal aspects of the three hydraulic systems are closely regulated. This unique Fly-by-wire architecture was optimized for weight, ease of aircraft manufacture/assembly, reliability, and field maintenance by using a technical approach that integrates system components to create rugged individual line replaceable units (LRU's). The integration concept was validated early in the 525 program by development testing of the components. This approach ensured that the aircraft build schedule would not be impacted by the hydraulic system design. Thermal design of the hydraulic system was optimized using Dynamic Physics based Amesim™ Hydraulic Systems Models to achieve weight targets of the hydraulic fluid conveyance system, and to fully validate the functional performance of the system. The sum total of these efforts led to an elegant 525 hydraulic system design which is successfully supporting 525 flight test activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207