Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Atropine Administered Ocularly Using an Ultrasensitive Bioanalytical Assay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Previous pharmacokinetic studies conducted on atropine sulfate ophthalmical solution have utilized bioanalytical assays that lacked sufficient sensitivity to fully characterize the complete pharmacokinetic profile. To address these limitations, Pharma Medica Research Inc. has developed and validated an ultrasensitive bioanalytical method capable of accurately quantifying the active enantiomer, L-hyoscyamine, with a very low limit of quantitation of 0.500 pg/mL. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of L-hyoscyamine in healthy subjects using a highly sensitive bioanalytical assay. Methods: Ten subjects were administered 0.3 mg of Isopto Atropine solution into the conjunctival sac of the eye. Blood samples were taken as early as 2 min and up to 24 h following administration. The plasma samples were assayed for L-hyoscyamine using a chiral method with an analytical range of 0.500–500 pg/mL. The pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using both a noncompartmental and compartmental approach. Results: The pharmacokinetics of L-hyoscyamine were fully characterized as there were no samples that were below the limit of quantitation following dosing. Using noncompartmental analysis, the mean C max was 467.9 ± 159.4 pg/mL with a median (range) T max of 0.5 (0.08–1) h. The mean area under the concentration–time curve was 1668.96 ± 436.02 h·pg/mL and the mean half-life was 3.91 ± 1.16 h. Overall, the study drug was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Through the utilization of a proprietary ultrasensitive bioanalytical method, a comprehensive investigation into the pharmacokinetics of L-hyoscyamine has been successfully conducted. This advanced method offers significant potential for optimizing study designs and facilitating in-depth examinations of the pharmacokinetics of ocularly administered atropine formulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".