Joint Visual and Haptic Signal Transmission for Immersive Interactions in Human Digital Twin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human digital twin (HDT) is envisioned as a system interconnecting physical twins (PTs) in the real world with virtual twins (VTs) in the digital world, enabling advanced human-centric applications. In this paper, we study an optimization of quality of experience (QoE) aware multimodal signal transmission, particularly focusing on joint visual and haptic signal feed-back transmissions from VT to its PT, for providing immersive interactions in HDT. To evaluate a synthesized performance of both visual and haptic experiences, we design a comprehensive QoE model, taking into account the video quality, continuous video quality switching rate and average haptic feedback error. Then, to maximize such QoE with a particular guarantee on synchronization between visual and haptic signal transmissions, we dynamically optimize the bandwidth allocation, bitrate and rendering mode of the video, and haptic signal's compression threshold. To this end, we propose a deep reinforcement learning based algorithm, called VisHap, which can produce an adaptive solution. Furthermore, we build an HDT multimodal interactions platform for collecting an authentic dataset, and by using it, we conduct experiments, showing that VisHap is not only feasible but also outperforms the counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".