MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integration of Green Hydrogen-based Loads, Storage and Generation in Electricity Markets

2024· article· en· W4403125964 on OpenAlexaff
Anshul Goyal, Kankar Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityElectricity generationStand-alone power systemHydrogen storageEnvironmental economicsHydrogenEnergy storageEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceElectrical engineeringBusinessRenewable energyDistributed generationEngineeringEconomicsPower (physics)ChemistryPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy transition, shifting from fossil-fuel based to clean resources, is a critical step toward achieving net-zero emission targets, and is being explored worldwide. Green hydrogen is a potential zero-carbon solution to meet decarbonization goals. In this context, this paper presents a novel framework and mathematical model to integrate hydrogen-based emission free resources (HEFRs) in a locational marginal price (LMP)-based day-ahead market (DAM). The model takes into account the detailed physical, energy arbitrage and operational characteristics of the HEFRs. The proposed model is tested on the IEEE 24-bus Reliability Test System (RTS) with PV and wind included, and is formulated as a mixed integer programming (MIP) problem. The results demonstrate the benefits of the proposed framework and the impact of HEFRs participation on market settlement, marginal prices, system emissions and system operation during normal, uncertainties and congestion scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207